![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
James |
|
THE SONS OF THUNDER In Luke's gospel, Jesus spots early warning signs from his disciples as they travel toward Jerusalem. These early warning signs indicate that violence is on the way unless someone puts a stop to it. James and John show us why they were nicknamed Sons of Thunder. Their outburst, upon entering a Samaritan village, was a thunderous early warning signal to Jesus. One he countered, so that people would not be swept away by violence. We know little about why Samaritans hated Jesus and his followers. Like all hatred on the part of one group of people toward another, it is difficult to discover where it all started. Perhaps there were tribal, cultural and ethnic differences that had created enmity between Samaritans and Jesus' followers. This animosity becomes visible in today's story when the Samaritans refuse to offer hospitality to Jesus and the disciples as they travel the hot, dusty and dangerous road to Jerusalem. Several incidents scattered through the Synoptics suggest that James and John had that particular character indicated by the name Boanerges, sons of thunder, given to them by the Lord (Mark 3:17); they were burning and impetuous in their evangelical zeal and severe in temper. James and John, hungry, tired and expecting Middle Eastern hospitality, washed feet, good food, and a place to sleep are outraged that it is denied them. And so, their thundering voices are raised toward Jesus: "Lord, do you want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them?" (Luke 9:54; cf. 9:49) These firebrands, James and John, give Jesus an early warning signal that the disciples still have not understood the nonviolent message Jesus has been trying to teach them. They still don't understand that military might and violent warfare will not save them, or the world in which they live. Later (Luke 22:47-51), as Roman troops come to arrest Jesus, his followers try to defend him by crying out, "Lord, shall we draw our sword?" Before Jesus has a chance to respond, one of them slices off the ear of a man charged to arrest him. When Jesus sees this, he cries out: "Enough!"
| ![]() |
|
The two sons of Zebedee, as well as Simon (Peter) and his brother Andrew with whom they were
in partnership (Luke 5:10), were called by the Lord upon the Sea of Galilee, where all four with
Zebedee and his hired servants were engaged in their ordinary occupation of fishing. The sons of
Zebedee "forthwith left their nets and father, and followed him" (Matthew 4:22), and became
"fishers of men". St. James was afterwards with the other eleven called to the Apostleship (Matthew 10:1-4; Mark 3:13-19; Luke 6:12-16; Acts 1:13). In all four lists the names of Peter and Andrew, James and John form the first group, a prominent and chosen group (cf. Mark 13:3); especially Peter, James, and John. These three Apostles alone were admitted to be present at the miracle of the raising of Jairus's daughter (Mark 5:37; Luke 8:51), at the Transfiguration (Mark 9:1; Matthew 17:1; Luke 9:28), and the Agony in Gethsemani (Matthew 26:37; Mark 14:33). The fact that the name of James occurs always (except in Luke 8:51; 9:28; Acts 1:13 -- Greek Text) before that of his brother seems to imply that James was the elder of the two. It is worthy of notice that James is never mentioned in the Gospel of St. John; this author observes a humble reserve not only with regard to himself, but also about the members of his family. HIS MARTYRDOM On the last journey to Jerusalem, their mother Salome came to the Lord and said to Him: "Say that these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on thy left, in thy kingdom" (Matthew 20:21). And the two brothers, still ignorant of the spiritual nature of the Messianic Kingdom, joined with their mother in this eager ambition (Mark 10:37). And on their assertion that they are willing to drink the chalice that He drinks of, and to be baptized with the baptism of His sufferings, Jesus assured them that they will share His sufferings (Mark 5:38-39). James won the crown of martyrdom fourteen years after this prophecy, A.D. 44. Herod Agrippa I, son of Aristobulus and grandson of Herod the Great, reigned at that time as "king" over a wider dominion than that of his grandfather. His great object was to please the Jews in every way, and he showed great regard for the Mosaic Law and Jewish customs. In pursuance of this policy, on the occasion of the Passover of A.D. 44, he perpetrated cruelties upon the Church, whose rapid growth incensed the Jews. The zealous temper of James and his leading part in the Jewish Christian communities probably led Agrippa to choose him as the first victim. "He killed James, the brother of John, with the sword." (Acts 12:1-2). According to a tradition, which, as we learn from Eusebius (Hist. Eccl., II, ix, 2, 3), was received from Clement of Alexandria (in the seventh book of his lost "Hypotyposes"), the accuser who led the Apostle to judgment, moved by his confession, became himself a Christian, and they were beheaded together. As Clement testifies expressly that the account was given him "by those who were before him," this tradition has a better foundation than many other traditions and legends respecting the Apostolic labours and death of St. James. |